Monday 4 February 2013

Why you should lie to your partners

Poly Means Many: There are many aspects of polyamory. Each month, the PMM bloggers will write about their views on one of them. Links to all posts can be found at polymeansmany.com

Captain Bluntschli: You said youd told only two lies in your whole life. Dear young lady: isnt that rather a short allowance? I'm quite a straightforward man myself; but it wouldnt last me a whole morning. - Act III, Arms and the Man by George Bernard Shaw

If you're reading any "how to" guide to polyamory, you're going to be told (in a variety of words and ways) time and time again that you should talk honestly about everything. I broadly agree, but I think this zeal for being honest and communicating about everything can be taken too far. In fact, one of the key skills in communication is knowing when not to communicate and when not to be honest.

All good parents lie to their children sometimes. Unless there are people out there who are genuinely never bored by reading the same, sodding five page cardboard book a dozen times in succession, or who really enjoy standing around in the cold to push their child on swing for twenty minutes, we all do it. We all want our children to feel that their parents love spending time with them, and that their feelings and interests are important to us. So we read the book again (doing the voices, of course), and we laugh and smile and sing and play, even when we'd rather not. Even when we're bored, frustrated or even on the edge of losing our tempers.

Usually, these lies are really just moments when we push aside misleading or counter-productive thoughts and feelings, and choose to act out of love instead. Losing my temper, or denying my daughter my company might feel satisfying in the moment, but once that moment has passed, I'd not only feel guilty, but I'd have hurt someone I love. When I'm able (and I'm not always able) to push aside these destructive thoughts and force myself to act out of love, even when I don't feel it, I feel better about myself than if I'd succumbed to cheap honesty.

Dr Laura Markham, who writes the amazing Aha! Parenting describes this process as mindfulness. She says that "Being mindful means that you pay attention to what you're feeling, rather than just acting on it," and so taking a pause, allowing the emotion to pass through you, and not acting until you are more in control. It's a key skill in parenting, she believes, not least because it's a skill we should all want our children to have. It's a myth that you should express your anger expressing anger actually makes you more angry. So if you express your anger to someone you love, whether that is a child or a partner, not only might you have thought of a better way of dealing with it if you'd just waited a moment, but you've made yourself more angry, and probably upset or riled the other person up as well. Honesty - not always useful.

On rare occasions, the best way to communicate is to lie. Or at least, to keep the truth to yourself for now. Suppose your partner is about to go out on a date, which you have had plenty of notice for and have happily agreed to, but just before they go, you have a pang of jealousy. You're not okay. You don't want your partner to fall for this new person. You don't want them to kiss or hold hands. Do you call them up to say this? Or perhaps you hear your partner and their other lover's sex noises, and although you said it was fine for them to stay over, you feel left out and lonely, and just want them to stop. Do you interrupt?

If you pause and allow the emotion to pass through you, you might find that dealing with the feeling yourself is the best way of handling it. Do you really want your partner to go on their date thinking that you are unhappy? Will you be glad tomorrow if they've cancelled the date on your behalf? Do you want your metamour to feel awkward and unwanted in your house? How would you want them to behave if the situation was reversed? It might be better to generously lie and say that you hope they have a lovely night, or to distract yourself with a hobby and play music loudly. You might find that once the emotion has passed, you really do want them to have a good time, and you're glad you didn't spoil it for them. Or maybe you talk about it later, when your emotions have cooled, and you are better placed to rationally consider what you want them to do differently next time, if anything. You don't need to bury your feelings, just find a better time and way to deal with them.

Analysing your own thoughts and feelings in this way is hard. That's why toddlers can't do it: they are relentlessly honest with their emotions, screaming with rage, hitting people who annoy them, throwing things they don't want and weeping at temporary separations from the people they love. I don't expect my daughter to be able to manage these difficult feelings based on how they might make me feel yet, but I do think it's fair to expect adults to be at least try to do this for each other. So when I find myself tempted to say something hurtful or selfish, my goal is to push that aside and to think, instead of being honest, can I act out of love instead?

12 comments:

  1. Yes. Yes, yes, yes! For so long I have felt like a bit of a weirdo for staying calm, "bottling things up" and waiting until I understand what's going on in my brain before tackling certain emotional issues. I've been called out on my "lies" before too, but what you've described above is exactly what I'm doing. If I know being brutally honest will hurt the people I love, I'd rather fib a little bit now and see if the feeling passes. Most of the time it does.

    I shall remember Dr Markham's description of mindfulness in this context. I keep the truth to myself sometimes at work and it helps me remain calm in difficult situations. I think it's earned me respect from my colleagues too. Hopefully the same works for my personal relationships, but I do appreciate that everyone is different.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! :) You could argue, really, that by lying in the moment, you're being more broadly truthful. Because sometimes those heat of the moment thoughts and feelings aren't really reflective of how we think and feel in general. That feeling passes, but the love is the real truth.

      Delete
  2. Yay GBS and yay applied mindfulness!
    I see a lot of sense in this, my only comment would be that in relationships where there is a great deal of knowledge and closeness it can be counterproductive to undertake this kind of acting when there is a chance it'll be spotted. To use your example, if I were heading off for that date and spotted that one of my partners was not okay.. I'm not sure if I could take their (kind) lies at face value if I recognised them as such. I'd want to un-bury the truth. This might just be me but I would far, far rather have someone say "actually I'm having a bit of a jealous moment, but i'm fairly sure it will pass - so you go ahead". It's different with kids of course, and new relationships where you might be happily oblivious.. but for longer-term close relationships, though I understand your stance and you convey it well, this isn't the way for me :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reporting serious distress as just "a bit of a jealous moment" is still putting aside the depths of your feelings, and avoiding asking for what you actually want ("don't go!) so I think it still counts! For example, I don't think that I could always dismiss my anger when parenting, but I hope that I could at least tell my daughter that I am too angry to respond right now, and take a few minutes to calm down. This is still far better, I think, than allowing myself to be honest about what I'm actually thinking/feeling in the midst of losing my temper.

      Delete
    2. Fair point. I can agree on telling fibs about the depth for the greater good! Still I think I'd rather have that between close partners/metamours, or not know at all with less close partners/metamours, than realise something is 'off' but not know what - iykwim :)

      Delete
  3. Ooooh. This gives me so many Thoughts and I love it! WAY thought provoking. EXCELLENT. *Mr. Burns hands*

    First off, I am in total agreement about the idea of taking time to process a feeling instead of just blurting it out the second you feel it. This is something I do often, because I recognize myself as an emotional individual and need to have a little time with a particular feeling to figure it out before I feel comfortable putting words to it. I do, however, work REALLY hard to keep from lying to do so. I'm pretty sticky mentally about lying, and the thought of doing so bothers me. However, I think just not spitting something out the second it pops into existence is not lying; that's just being mindful, as you said. I love that word. Mindfulness is excellent.

    At the same time, I can totally see what Amanda is talking about, and really rather agree with her point as well. I would, personally, rather be told that something was bothering someone but that they were still processing it than just see something was wrong and getting told everything was fine. Again, this kind of goes back to the actual lying and how that doesn't sit very well with me. Again, as Amanda said, this sort of thing really only sort of applies with relationships and not with children for obvious reasons. But I do think that's there's a kind of mindfulness happy middle that can be achieved with just the right amount of introspection and honesty to oneself and everyone involved.

    LOVE this. Such a great view!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I don't have the same aversion to lies! I don't think that lying is an *inherently* negative or troubling act, and I think that honesty is often overrated. For example, the two lies in the quote above were to save someone's life, but the character still views the lies as a problem. (And of course, she is lying about the number of lies she's told.)

      I think it isn't enough to be mindful of our emotions, we do also have to sometimes speak and behave in ways that go against these emotions in order to be kind. Like pretending I'm enjoying a game with my daughter when I'm not, or pretending that I'm happy to support a partner at an event where they need me, but I'd really rather not go. Or perhaps my partner wants to do go to a particular restaurant for their birthday that I don't care for, so I say "that sounds lovely!" rather than "urgh!"

      I think the closer we are to someone, the more honesty from them we expect, and can hopefully handle, but even so, *sometimes* telling the truth is unnecessarily cruel, even to our partners.

      Delete
  4. You write: "On rare occasions, the best way to communicate is to lie. Or at least, to keep the truth to yourself for now." But it seems to me there's a pretty huge difference between these two things. You make a great case for the latter, which seems to me right. But I don't really see that you've made a case for lying. I'd feel somewhat violated if I found out I'd been lied to by my partner, in a way completely different from if she'd merely kept some negative feelings to herself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. I'm not sure the distinction between the two is always that useful or significant, Jonathan, and I don't think that keeping your feelings to yourself without lying is always possible. Even faking a smile with the intent to cover up a negative thought could be seen as a lie.

      Just keeping quiet, without lying, could amount to a serious violation in some situations (infidelity in a monogamous relationship, for example) whereas there are some outright lies which are expected and even welcomed (perhaps lying to cover up a surprise party). Extreme examples, I know, but I think that the form that the deception comes in (explicit or just evasion) isn't always the most important factor.

      If you have serious, persistent misgivings about something in your relationship, merely keeping this to yourself would be a *terrible* idea, whereas I think lying to hide a minor, fleeting negative thought, or to cover up anger so you can find a better time to deal with it, is something I'd see as considerate rather than problematic.

      Delete
  5. I agree that there are cases where deception without lying is very serious in a way comparable to lying. But that doesn't mean that there's not a distinction, and one that is morally significant. I don't agree that faking a smile could be a lie in anything but a highly unusual situation. Lying is a kind of linguistic act, in a way that smiling is not.

    I'm not saying that lying is always terrible, either; I'm just not sure I see that you've convinced me that it's a good idea in the kinds of cases you're talking about, when there often are less committal ways to be considerate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't find it particularly useful to separate out linguistic and nonlinguistic/paralinguistic communication in this context. To me, it's the depth and intention of the deception which is important, not the form that the deception takes.

      Delete
  6. I like the way you've phrased that last comment - 'the depth and intention of the deception which is important', and that bleeds into other areas of ethical polyamory. Like lying to yourself? Can you genuinely deceive yourself?

    Perhaps not lying, but also not disclosing to yourself the level of your personal discomfort, in order to be kind to yourself. There's definitely an element of emotional coaching involved with all my relationships, my professional ones included. By telling myself that I feel fine, that it's not that bad, that I'm just having a bit of a jealous moment, I feel I can sometimes cut myself a little slack to process my feelings when I feel better able to. Then report back to my loved ones when I know where I stand.

    I guess this isn't so closely linked to deception or lying, but rather the intention behind my understanding of what you're saying, is that sometimes being kind is better than being honest.

    ReplyDelete